Can you imagine your child or your grandchild—or yourself—in either of those two scenarios, looking over your shoulder every 10 seconds to avoid being hit by a car as you walk along the road or finding yourself in an unwinnable and potentially tragic race to cross the road at an intersection while dodging vehicles at a rate of more than one every second?

Some school districts don’t transport more students because the hazardous walking conditions statute makes it difficult and costly for them to do so, and the statute doesn’t do what it purports to do: identify conditions that are hazardous to students and satisfy the Constitutional and statutory requirement to provide for safe access to public education.

The criteria described in Florida’s hazardous walking conditions statute is unrealistic, unreasonable, outdated, and it’s discouraging school districts from safeguarding their students against the genuinely dangerous conditions they encounter between their homes and school. The evidence is in the numbers and in the criteria itself.

To a certain extent, the statute has forced Florida school districts to choose between putting funds into the classroom or ensuring that their students arrive at school safely.